Access control handles who comes in. Smart lockers handle what goes out.
The problem
Vehicle keys in a drawer, protective equipment in an unlocked cupboard, tools “borrowed” two months ago, a colleague’s laptop left at the front desk while they travel. Every organisation has a point where objects change hands without leaving a trace, and that point is almost always staffed by somebody who has other work to do.
The paper log next to the cupboard is the attempt to fix it, and it fails for the same reason the visitor book fails: it gets filled in when there is time, which is to say almost never.
How it works
A cabinet of compartments with electronic locks. It opens with the same card as access control, with a PIN or from a smartphone. A compartment opens only for someone authorised for that item, and every opening is recorded with who, what and when.
You set the rules: fixed assignment to a person, free collection from a pool of compartments, mandatory return by end of shift, an approval step for the items that need one.
The uses we see most often:
- Vehicle and room keys — who takes the van key at six in the morning, and who has not brought it back.
- Personal protective equipment — traceable issue, which is also the documentary proof that the issue happened.
- Tools and measuring instruments — with history per item, linked to the inventory.
- Shared devices — tablets, radios, terminals, loan laptops.
- Secure handover — the person depositing and the person collecting need neither to meet nor to overlap in time.
Why it belongs in this family
Because it is the same card, the same personnel record and the same log as access control. Someone who leaves the company loses the door and the compartment at the same moment — which is exactly where separate systems get it wrong.
Who it’s for
Companies with a fleet, for keys. Industry and construction, for PPE and tools. Healthcare, for devices shared across shifts. Public bodies and schools, for equipment on loan. Logistics, for handovers between shifts that do not overlap.
Related regulation
⭐ No rule obliges you to install a smart locker, and we would rather say so before somebody else tells you the opposite. Two things do touch it closely:
| Rule | Why it matters here |
|---|---|
| Italian Legislative Decree 81/2008 — personal protective equipment | Issuing PPE has to be documented. A cabinet that records every collection produces that documentation as a side effect, with no form to sign |
| GDPR and Workers’ Statute art. 4 | The collection log is data about identifiable workers: the same purpose limits as access control apply, and the same rule about talking to employee representatives first |
Questions we get asked
Does every cabinet need power and a network?
Power, yes. A network is recommended but not indispensable in every configuration: as with the doors, the unit keeps deciding locally and synchronises when the connection returns.
What happens if somebody does not bring the item back?
The system knows who took it and when, and can chase it at the deadline you set. It changes behaviour more than any internal policy, because the reminder reaches the right person.
Can it use the same card as access control?
Yes, and that is the main reason this solution pays off for anyone who already has a system: same credential, same personnel record, same moment of revocation.
Can the compartments be customised?
Yes, in size and fittings: small compartments for keys and phones, large ones for tools and helmets, with charging sockets where equipment has to come back charged.
Does it integrate with asset inventory?
Yes. A labelled item has one history, covering both locker collections and inventory reads.
Let’s talk about what you need to keep → · Go to access control →